PSNH rates go up–anyone surprised?

money-down-the-toiletThanks to the government the cost of living and doing business in New Hampshire just went up again.

It goes like this.  In 2007 the state mandated that by 2025 providers get 25% of the energy they provide from renewable sources (Wood, wind, solar, etc) and that process (its called RPS, the Regional Portfolio Standard) is already under way .  This  Jan 1st 2009 we began the RGGI cap and trade scheme which requires energy providers to buy carbon credits quarterly whose increased costs are also passed on to rate payers.

So these government mandates are now pig-piling on top of your lifestyle, in a down economy no less, during a ten year cooling trend, all to solve a problem that doesn’t even appear to exist.    How bad is it–get the numbers on the jump.

Continue reading

Posted in Energy, Local NH Politics, taxes | Leave a comment

Deval-u-ing your borders

Deval Patrick knows spending, and so he also knows taxes.  And when you think you might have taxed your own state about as much as you can–and no I don’t think he’s even come close to that yet–you start taxing other states.
“What I would love to see is … border tolls at all of the interstate entrances, maybe Route 3 as well. In other words, Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York. If we did that right, it would be possible to remove all of the tolls inside of the Commonwealth. Maybe you’d keep something at the tunnel,”  -Gov. Deval Patrick as reported in the Boston Globe
Three thoughts come to mind.  First, just another reason to spend my money in New Hampshire; Second, if he charged people to leave the state he’d make alot more revenue; third, who does he think he’s kidding with that “it would be possible to remove all the tolls inside the Commonwealth…” schtick.
Posted in Around New England, taxes | Leave a comment

Obama keeps a promise (maybe two)

Today President Obama reached out to the global community in a way that only he could.

Effective, well now, he is bailing out people in foreign countries who want an O-bortion (including late term O-bortions) and want it paid for with American tax dollars. (That includes New Hampshire Tax dollars)

Sure, there’s some stipulations about family planning, but you should always remember the time worn maxim; federal funding for abortions doesn’t kill unborn babies, the guy who authorizes it does.

 

Cross-posted at NHInsider.com

Posted in National Politics & Policy, taxes | Leave a comment

Merrimack Town Council says No! to spending cap.

The Merrimack Town council sent Mike Malzone’s motion to put a spending cap charter amendment on the ballot down in flames. With a vote of 6 to 1 against, with only Councilor Malzone in favor, the councilors made it known that they were uncomfortable with the cap, and were not certain it would be any better than what amounted in their opinion to a town that had already demonstrated responsible spending habits.  

The course of the debate was predictable.  What good would it do for the council to embrace a cap when the School board and school budget could blow the entire project out of the water?   There were comments that the cap was not adequately tested and some general concern over how the board might look every time they needed to execute the majority rule to override the cap for emergency spending measures.

So if the town is so responsible what risk is there in a spending cap tied to cost of living increases?  I don’t recall anyone asking that question, not even me.   Does the town need to spend more money each year than inflation requires and if so why?  Again, no one asked that, not even me. (I have an excuse–I’m new to this.)

Continue reading

Posted in Local NH Politics, taxes | Leave a comment

The Town of Merrimack seeks a Spending cap

Citizens in Merrimack have formally announced their intention to add a spending and tax cap amendment to the town charter this year.  The petition committee paperwork will be filed Monday January 5th at the Merrimack town hall by Matt Murphy, a representative of the New Hampshire Advantage Coalition (NHAC), and Merrimack Town Councilor Mike Malzone.

 

This amendment is identical to the one that passed in Rochester last November by a 70% to 30% margin.

 

The spending cap allows for increased spending from year to year but pegs the amount of the increase to the cost of living, sometimes referred to as the rate of inflation.  The tax cap portion protects property owners by restricting increases to the property tax rate under the same formula.  The latter protection is of particular importance during revaluations.  The combination of the tax-cap on tax-rate increases and the spending cap on the budget combine to prevent the town from using increased values as a motivation to raise taxes or spending beyond the fixed formula.

 

But the cap doesn’t just limit spending and tax increases.  It also comes with a provision for allowing supplemental or emergency spending within the framework of the town charter, whenever two-thirds of the town council votes to approve it.  So at no point is the town prevented from addressing necessary short term spending that occurs outside the normal operating budget.  But that spending is only good for the duration of that fiscal year, and cannot be included in the operating budget when calculating the next year’s budget.  But it can be apporved in succeeding years by another two-thirds vote if the town council has the will to do so.

 

Opponents, most often town employees or those employed by the town through a union will insist that this kind of cap will force a cutback in services; even critical services like police and fire.  But Derry, Franklin, Laconia, Nashua, and Dover all have a spending cap.  Some of these towns have been operating under a cap for 15 years or more, and none of them are starving for public services.  There is no shortage of policeman or fireman.  But that’s what they’ll tell you is going to happen.  It’s simply not true.

 

It is important to remember that while the town will always need to address spending issues, that spending should not be permitted to exceed the ability of the taxpayers to fund it.  Most of us will not get a significant raise every year, not in our paychecks, nor see that in the value of our homes.  Perhaps not for some time.  Most people won’t even see a fraction of that–particularly under the current economic conditions–yet the unions, and the budget writers could continue to ignore these facts when they talk about spending.

 

By asking the Town of Merrimack to approach its budget the same way Merrimack’s families approach their own, we are simply mandating more responsible management in how local government operates.   We are reconnecting the budget writing process to reality, matching our own expenses with the cost of living, and asking our elected officials to do the same.

 

Thomas Jefferson once wrote in a letter to John Taylor that, “Excessive taxation…will carry reason and reflection to every man’s door, and particularly in the hour of election.”  Well we are prepared to carry a petition to every door, and ask your support in amending the town charter–so that the cost of government will never exceeded our ability to fund what is truly necessary for our mutual well being.

Posted in Local NH Politics, New Hampshire News, taxes | Leave a comment

A last minute stocking stuffer from Planned Parenthood

How would you like to wake up on Christmas morning to find a gift certificate in your stocking? How about one from Planned Parenthood?

 

Before you explode with moral outrage—if that’s something you feel inclined towards doing–think about what a gift like this says. Even though 95% of PP’s business is terminating pregnancies, they do provide other related services like screenings and birth control. Would you want to receive a free pap smear this holiday season? How about a pelvic exam?

 

I’d imagine the same feminists who would storm the gates with pitchforks and torches to emasculate any man daft enough to give his woman a kitchen appliance as a holiday gift, are probably more than just OK with a pelvic exam (pap-smear or even, you know what) from Planned Parenthood as a suitable Yule tide offering.  This of course completely abrogates (or should I say aborts?) the last vestiges of a tradition that began by acknowledging life and creation with gifts, and a divine one at that. 

 

 

 

I mean reallly, do you know a man who would actually give this gift to the woman in his life–and if he did should he be suspicious?  And doesn;t this just add a whole new dimension to the secret Santa or Yankee Swap at the office or family party?

 

Well, be prepared.  Planned Parenthood in Indiana (and I beleive Michigan) are offering gift certificates of varying cash values, to anyone with the perspicacity to put the “planned” back into Planned Parenthood.  In fact the organization has considered running the program all year round so it can’t be too long before the gift that says you really care is available in our corner of Mother natures womb.

 

 

 

Is there a woman in your life who has been neglecting her reproductive scheduled maintenance?

 

 

 

And what exactly are the rules of etiquette for this kind of giving?

 

 

 

Should we expect gift cards next with cute little pictures on them?  How distasteful will that get?

 

 

 

If you can even stand to think about it, the marketing opportunities boggle the mind.  Birthdays, holidays, divorces?  How about from your “uncle” on the anniversary of “that special day?”  You getting all of this governor–no parental consent in NH–Lynch?

 

 

 

I can actually picture the ‘Gift begins with Kay’ commercialization. A tender moment outdoors at night, soft holiday lighting, a gentle snowfall.  She smiles coyly–almost blushing (or is it the cold air?)–as the face each other, gloved hands reaching out between them.  But just before they can embrace he reaches into his pocket and…

You know MBNA credit will be all over this.  Introducing the Planned Parenthood credit card.   Turn your everyday purchases of gas and groceries into reward points you can redeem on ‘reproductive services’ at any Planned Parenthood location nationwide. 

They could even end the ads with a catchy phrase like… “What’s in your Vagina?”

Posted in Local NH Politics | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Building a better bailout

toon1114081Here’s a cure for the economic crisis.  Turn off the TV news.  I’m serious.  Then don’t bother to read the front or business pages of your newspaper, if you are one of the few people who still actually reads one.  Ignore the “HEADLINES” at your favorite home-page, and just skip to sports, or entertainment, or go Blog something.  Keep up on political issues other than this one.  And whenever possible look for stories that tell us why the government is more likely the problem and not the answer.  These are usually filled with things called ‘facts,’ ones that can be verified, and the tone tends to be less cataclysmic.  You may find yourself quite at ease, able to sleep at night, refreshed and able to take on new challenges.

 

No, it’s not perfect, but the 24/7 Newsertainment industry is such a complete waste of time—like a bunch of seagulls fighting over the last piece of bread—that getting away from the senseless noise they are making is usually all you need to get a handle on how un-cataclysmic this all really is.   They simply have no interest in your feeling safe or satisfied about anything.

 

 

Continue reading

Posted in National Politics & Policy, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Poked right in the RGGI

rggi2Tom Fahey reported in this Sunday’s Union Leader, that Linda Hodgdon, the State’s Administrative Services commissar had floated a trial balloon on the status of the estimated 18 million the PUC could net from its upcoming regional carbon credits auction this year.  Lynch’s team is looking for money and RGGI might just be sitting there like a shiny penny on the side walk.  Hodgdon, being a good bureaucrat–one who can always find ways to spend money she doesn’t have yet–wants to pick it up and put it in her pocket.
Posted in Energy, Local NH Politics, New Hampshire News, taxes | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

More Republican Boots on the Ground

462812978_a6cf63f0a1

The New Hampshire Republican Volunteer Coalition (NHRVC) is looking to establish itself as a ‘boots on the ground’ civilian army, recruiting and training activists and campaign volunteers to support what they call ‘Real Republican party candidates.’ What exactly are ‘Real Republican candidates?”

Their Mission statement defines them in just a few words.

“We are a grassroots coalition of highly motivated volunteers, working to elect articulate and principled Republicans who stand for low taxes, fiscal responsibility, free enterprise, individual liberty, and most importantly, the U.S. Constitution.

Our organization is dedicated to recruiting, supporting, and training Republican Party activists and campaign volunteers in New Hampshire.

NHRVC welcomes the membership of any citizen who supports these principles and is willing to get involved”

Given the extensive web presence of Republican, libertarian, and right leaning liberty-minded groups already in place, it will be interesting to see if the NHRVC can attract fresh volunteers from outside the existing right of center political web-culture. If they can create enough new interest, and co-ordinate that with the information and tactical experience already in place, it could go a long way to getting more ‘Real Republicans’ elected to office.

Just how much more?  Find out on the jump.

Continue reading

Posted in Local NH Politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

How State run health care could kill Freedom

299px-caduceus_svg

Whenever the state wants to trample all over your rights without appearing to do so,  it typically must find a States interest in whatever it is it wants to do.  This, in the simplest of terms, means that if the state as an advocate for the people, can demonstrate that they are acting in the people’s best interests (because the people somehow share a  stake in some common outcome) the State can presume to ‘manage’ that something for that purpose.   This is not to suggest that that is how the government has ever done anything in the past, only that technically, this piece of the puzzle makes it easier for them to assume control over things we might otherwise want them to stay out of if we spent more than a few minutes actually considering the consequences of letting them do just that.

 

So having said that, what happens if the state takes over the dispensing or management of health care insurance, or health care employees, or facilities themselves?   

 

Well, since there is probably not one circumstance or activity in the scope of human existence which cannot somehow, in some way, be tied to “Health Care” you are giving the government a license to take over anything it wants to.

 

Everything can (and would) eventually be drilled down to a cause and effect relationship where any impact on federal funding or assistance for health insurance or medical treatment with tax payer dollars, creates a State interest in acting upon those relationships.   This by extension and therefore default would make everything that happens everywhere an object of State interest.  When everything is an object of State interest freedom is reduced to whatever the state defines it as, in the interest of “protecting the people” of course. 

 

While this outcome may not be the stated objective of the democrats and those who favor partial or total socialization of health insurance or health care, once this door is opened, how can we reasonably expect the state to stop itself from regulating everything, and trampling our rights in the process.

 

The answer is that we can’t and shouldn’t expect it.   The government can’t give you freedom, it can only take it away.  And If you keep betting a little freedom to get something for nothing, you’ll eventually find yourself with nothing left to bet.

Posted in National Politics & Policy | Tagged , | Leave a comment