Dover NH GSPLPAC Tea Party- Live streaming

Follow the link to see the Dover NH Granite State Patriots Liberty PAC Tea Party.

http://granitegrok.com/blog/2012/04/gslpac-tea-party-event-live-streaming

Posted in Local NH Politics | Leave a comment

HB 1607 – Public Schools Could See Buckets of Free Money?

Skip just posted a nice letter at GraniteGrok from the Londonderry Superintendent of schools, in which the Super appears to lobby the state Senate in opposition to NH HB1607.  This bill establishes an education tax credit for businesses or groups that set up scholarship programs to help offset the costs of non-public school tuition.  This could allow more parents to enroll their kids outside of the governments education monopoly and on paper at least take the paltry sum of $3,450.00 per student with them when the business is reimbursed for its donations with a tax credit of that amount.   The business is, of course, free to set it’s award at any sum above that at their discretion, but the credit is (I assume) maxed out at $3450.00 per student.

Needless to say, the Super (Nate Greenberg) doesn’t care for the bill.  By his calculation each school district will lose money it needs to teach students and would necessarily downshift those costs onto local property taxpayers to make up the difference.

That argument sounds like it might hold water–the entire lobbying question Skip raises aside–but only if taken in the vacuum of the space between the typical bureaucrats ears.  I wont revisit all the Super’s arguments here, just follow the link if you feel confused, but in my district, this bill would, on paper at least,  be like the school district finding a winning lottery ticket every single year.

In Merrimack the actual ‘on-paper’ cost per student is well over $14,000.00 each.; total enrollment of 4700 (ish) divided by our roughly 65+ million dollar school budget.  If a parent can only take $3,450.00 per child, then the town is still getting paid $11,000.00 dollar per child with no child left to teach.
To see how that looks if we borrow the formula the Super’s letter

COPUPPSE (Cost of Over-priced Under Performing Public School Education) –  PTPR (Pittance of Tuition Parent Receives) = JPSS  (Jackpot for Public School System)
In my case, using the 5 fewer students per grade level model, including kindergarten, that would net the district an extra  $700,000.00 per year in revenue for which there are no “students” to spend it on.  Free money?

So the problem won’t be downshifting costs on taxpayers,  it will be a Super and a School Board explaining why the district still needs more than $11,000.00 dollars per non-existent student not to educate those non- students that do not exist.   $700,000.00 – 0 = $700,000.00.

And having made that argument successfully, should we expect that as a line item in all future school budgets regardless of the outcome of HB 1607?  “We’d like to add a million to the school budget for not educating roughly 90 non-students, in the next fiscal year.”

HB1607 is like free money, unless of course the taxpayers want to have a discussion about why it costs so damn much to send a kid to public school.  That might be a problem worth the Super’s time.

So Quit your bitching.

by Steve MacDonald

Posted in Local NH Politics | Leave a comment

What About the New Hampshire Budget?

(Re-post with title)

New Hampshire Democrats are like three year olds
One of the major themes of the New Hampshire Democrats is that the current New Hampshire Republican majority is not focusing enough on the budget and the economy, and spending too much time on other issues.   But this is an understandable position for leftists.

When the Democrats ran the entire state for four years, every session (almost every week) was about the budget, and how they had to raise more revenue.   The reason for that is that their estimates were always so distant from reality, and their over spending so profligate, that they could not help but be obsessed, at every opportunity, with trying to fix a mess of their own making .  The budget, (and the economy)–how to milk more taxes and fees out of the taxpayers or regulate and tax local businesses–was always on the agenda, often into the small hours of the morning of the day after the day they were supposed to have this all worked out by law.  Democrat stewardship of the budget and the economy was one long, constant, cluster-***k.   (With time spent while ducking the budget problems by trying to stomp on free speech, socializing medicine, scaring off business, and a long laundry list of nonsense too long to regurgitate here.)

The Republican majority, on the other hand, doing what you do at the grown-up table, already took care of  all that business in the first session.   Budget, estimates, cuts, revenues, done.   No last minute nonsense, no late night sessions.  No passing bills without hearings or making up taxes or fees they would later have to rescind–whose revenue they would then also have to replace again and again…  And no Rube Goldbergian accounting tricks, or counting money from this year for that year or adding in the potential sale of things like land that you will never actually sell.  None of that.

The Democrats hate Republicans for that.

We’ve had to endure the left wings wailing about the Republican revenue estimates being too low on purpose.   Their endless whining about underestimating just so we could cut programs.   The left handed chest pounding about what was cut, all for no good reason–because revenues are pretty close to estimates.  When we lose a bit one month we seem to make it up someplace else or in the next month–without any additional fiddling by the legislature.   The revenue estimates are accurate and sound; the cuts well thought out and well distributed.  So the Democrats were wrong again, and they hate that.

As for the economy, well, Republicans think the economy can take care of itself when the government does two things.  It must budget responsibly, and get the hell out of the way.   If they happen to have any time left over, the best thing the Legislature could do for the New Hampshire economy, is to get state government “more” the hell out of the way.

Democrats hate that as well.  The government IS the economy as viewed from the left side of the aisle.  It can’t possibly function properly without the central planners looking over its shoulder.  To just sit idly by and let the free market do its thing?  The ADHD, OCD, and  NHDP’s kick in to high gear.   These Democrats are like a sugar addled three year old forced to stand quietly in line for the next available teller.  They have to touch everything, play with it, complain about it, or break it.  And if you don’t pay attention to them they yank on your skirt, or pull on your pant leg, they whine, and scream, and make a scene, attracting all the attention for as long as they can until someone acquiesces just to shut-them-the-hell-up!
(This aptly describes the current state of New Hampshire Democrats and their entire 2012 election strategy.)

Unable to tinker endlessly with ways to increase central planning, or to add spending we can’t afford, the progressives naturally assume the Republicans–having neither the need nor the inclination to behave as they do–are not doing enough.   Why aren’t they focused on the budget and the economy they holler,  as if stuck in the back seat, yelling “you’re doing it wrong, let me drive!”

But what Republicans did with the budget and spending (and the economy)–this is how grown ups properly run your government.  It’s done.  They’ve moved on to other things.  And it is the Democrat parties greatest fear that the voters will figure that out, or decide that they like it this way.  If they do, Democrats will never be allowed into the majority in New Hampshire, ever again.  They’ll be stuck in the back seat of state, left to whine and complain about what everyone else is doing wrong.   What you have to remember is that there is a reason they are back there in the booster seat.   They haven’t the slightest  idea how to drive.

Posted in Local NH Politics | Leave a comment

Untitled

New Hampshire Democrats are like three year olds
One of the major themes of the New Hampshire Democrats is that the current New Hampshire Republican majority is not focusing enough on the budget and the economy, and spending too much time on other issues.   But this is an understandable position for leftists.

When the Democrats ran the entire state for four years, every session (almost every week) was about the budget, and how they had to raise more revenue.   The reason for that is that their estimates were always so distant from reality, and their over spending so profligate, that they could not help but be obsessed, at every opportunity, with trying to fix a mess of their own making .  The budget, (and the economy)–how to milk more taxes and fees out of the taxpayers or regulate and tax local businesses–was always on the agenda, often into the small hours of the morning of the day after the day they were supposed to have this all worked out by law.  Democrat stewardship of the budget and the economy was one long, constant, cluster-***k.   (With time spent while ducking the budget problems by trying to stomp on free speech, socializing medicine, scaring off business, and a long laundry list of nonsense too long to regurgitate here.)

The Republican majority, on the other hand, doing what you do at the grown-up table, already took care of  all that business in the first session.   Budget, estimates, cuts, revenues, done.   No last minute nonsense, no late night sessions.  No passing bills without hearings or making up taxes or fees they would later have to rescind–whose revenue they would then also have to replace again and again…  And no Rube Goldbergian accounting tricks, or counting money from this year for that year or adding in the potential sale of things like land that you will never actually sell.  None of that.

The Democrats hate Republicans for that.

We’ve had to endure the left wings wailing about the Republican revenue estimates being too low on purpose.   Their endless whining about underestimating just so we could cut programs.   The left handed chest pounding about what was cut, all for no good reason–because revenues are pretty close to estimates.  When we lose a bit one month we seem to make it up someplace else or in the next month–without any additional fiddling by the legislature.   The revenue estimates are accurate and sound; the cuts well thought out and well distributed.  So the Democrats were wrong again, and they hate that.

As for the economy, well, Republicans think the economy can take care of itself when the government does two things.  It must budget responsibly, and get the hell out of the way.   If they happen to have any time left over, the best thing the Legislature could do for the New Hampshire economy, is to get state government “more” the hell out of the way.

Democrats hate that as well.  The government IS the economy as viewed from the left side of the aisle.  It can’t possibly function properly without the central planners looking over its shoulder.  To just sit idly by and let the free market do its thing?  The ADHD, OCD, and  NHDP’s kick in to high gear.   These Democrats are like a sugar addled three year old forced to stand quietly in line for the next available teller.  They have to touch everything, play with it, complain about it, or break it.  And if you don’t pay attention to them they yank on your skirt, or pull on your pant leg, they whine, and scream, and make a scene, attracting all the attention for as long as they can until someone acquiesces just to shut-them-the-hell-up!
(This aptly describes the current state of New Hampshire Democrats and their entire 2012 election strategy.)

Unable to tinker endlessly with ways to increase central planning, or to add spending we can’t afford, the progressives naturally assume the Republicans–having neither the need nor the inclination to behave as they do–are not doing enough.   Why aren’t they focused on the budget and the economy they holler,  as if stuck in the back seat, yelling “you’re doing it wrong, let me drive!”

But what Republicans did with the budget and spending (and the economy)–this is how grown ups properly run your government.  It’s done.  They’ve moved on to other things.  And it is the Democrat parties greatest fear that the voters will figure that out, or decide that they like it this way.  If they do, Democrats will never be allowed into the majority in New Hampshire, ever again.  They’ll be stuck in the back seat of state, left to whine and complain about what everyone else is doing wrong.   What you have to remember is that there is a reason they are back there in the booster seat.   They haven’t the slightest  idea how to drive.

Posted in Local NH Politics | Leave a comment

NH Unions Using Religious Bigotry to Affect Merrimack School Board Elections?

I was recently informed (my source has asked to remain anonymous for good reason) that a teacher from a nearby town was repulsed at the sight of a Joe Kearns for School Board sign on a Merrimack residents lawn.   When asked “why that reaction” she proceeded to explain that her union had told her that Merrimack School Board candidate Joe Kearns was a member of the Christian Coalition.   If the union told her, it must be true, right?  Smart lady like that would have looked that up.

But if she had looked it up she would know that Joe is not a member of the Christian Coalition, and so would her union.  Neither of them did, or neither of them cares to know the truth.  But they did want someone to know the lie.

Why is the Teachers union (the NEA-NH) telling members from outside the town what amounts to an outright lie?  Given that candidate Gary Krupp has been asked on several occasions, by people in town, if he would support teaching creationism if elected, to which he gave an excellent no answer, can we assume that the union is pushing a similar set of lies with its membership inside Merrimack?  How far has this false”suspicion” been spread?  What is the union so afraid of that it would “create” a false narrative about the Christian Coalition, and then implement a secret smear campaign to scare voters away from these two candidates?

And is it safe to assume there are no other “Christians” running for the School Board?  It might be a bit awkward to discover that they are all Christians, and that the union hacks had only lied about the two least likely to toe their line?

Has the union has put on it’s anti-religious equivalent of a white hood and tried to burn a digital cross in Merrimack’s front yard?   Are they simply declaring that anyone who is remotely attached to Christianity but who objects to any part of their political agenda could expect to be slandered because of their faith?  Why isn’t this religious bigotry?  How does this not classify as prejudice?
Makes you wonder who thinks they run things around here the taxpayers or the unions?

Home



Blogger- GraniteGrok.com
 

Twitter – @nhstevemacd 

Posted in Local NH Politics | Leave a comment

Are Campaign Signs Like Gray Hairs?

The joke says that when one gray hair gets yanked out a bunch come to the funeral.

A few days ago someone stole the Krupp for School Board sign from my yard.  I only had one.   Today, there are five of them.  I have room for a dozen more if I should happen to lose another and this is a very busy road.  (Election day is April 10th)

Krupp for School Board signs replacing the one that was stolen

Posted in Local NH Politics | Leave a comment

Did The Teamsters Local 633 Just Offer to Bribe Our NH State Senators?

From The NH Senate Right Work Hearing Transcript.
“Let me just be frank. The big, the elephant in the room here and I know it’s been said is the politics of it… This group gives to this party; it doesn’t give to this party. Well part of my job essentially is to ensure that at least the teamsters look at the individual, not necessarily the party per se… and see if they agree with their views…Senator, I would be more than happy to go back to my boss if you guys want to vote to kill this bill. I’d be more than happy to talk to my boss about helping you out and if you guys want to help the teamsters, I’m sure my boss would be more than happy to sit down with you.”
Rip Holden, rep Teamster Local 633

You scratch our back, and we’ll scratch yours.  Screw the taxpayers and everyone else.  So is this how a sliver of the population manages to dictate statewide policy?   We know it is how they bought up and corrupted the Democrat party.

Twitter – @nhstevemacd 

Posted in Local NH Politics | Leave a comment

Shaheen Tweets – The Return of Warren Buffett’s Secretary

Senator Shaheen Tweets- Warren Buffets Secretary
Senator Shaheen must be following orders, why else resurrect this left wing meme?  “Buffet pays effective tax rate of 11% Avg is 13.5% He’s paying lower rate than his own secretary.” (Just when Obama is pushing the Buffett rule again. Hmmmm.)

So here’s my problem.  When did “secretary” stop being one of those sexist, politically incorrect words we were forbidden to use?  Isn’t ‘secretary’ demeaning to women. Oh, wait, not when it makes the newest pawn in your Obamnomics Class Warfare Chess Set seem like a dowdy single mother instead of a 1%er who probably gets great bonuses and awesome Christmas presents from the Billionaire boss. (Chess set pieces delivered every four to six weeks, only 670 billion plus shipping and handling for each.)

OK, that’s not really the problem.  I want to know when Warrent Buffett’s ‘Secretary’ stopped paying 35.8%?

Back in the hey-day of this particualr vintage of class warfare rhetoric, (Jan of this year, actually) Buffet was paying 17.4% and his secretary was paying an impossible 35.8%.   Are we changing the argument?  Are Democrats admitting that that was just another exaggeration, or even made up out of whole cloth?

Senator Shaheen’s ‘Tweet’ begs all manner of suspicion.  Take the reference to the $44 Billion, for example.  In this context is she trying to infer that he has never paid taxes on all that money, or that he only ever paid 11% on any of it?   It’s a tweet.   Much is left to the imagination.   But you can see where people might think that Buffett has $44 Billion because he pays less in taxes than his hard working secretary.

Here’s another problem.  Let’s guess that Debbie Bosanek (That’s Ebenezer Buffett’s poverty stricken secretary) actually pays somewhere around 13.5% in taxes.  Even a forgiving estimate–according to Forbes.com–would put her adjusted gross income between $200,000.00 and $300,000.00 per year.  Bosanek also owns two homes, and does not seem to be doing too badly for herself.  Good for her.  She probably deserves it.  But doesn’t that, by all Democrat calculations, make her rich?  Or are we ignoring that now too?

Senator Shaheen has another problem.  She hails from a state (elected by and sworn to represent) that is averse to the very kinds of taxes and tax rhetoric she is employing here.   It is an aversion to taxes that has resulted in New Hampshire having one of the lowest tax burdens and one of the highest standards of living in the entire country.   The average Granite Stater makes more per year on average than in any state in the nation.  But nowhere near the amazing standard of living afforded that victim of evil capitalism, Warren Buffet’s secretary, at least based on the tax numbers Democrats keep attributing to her.

At the old rate of 35.8%, which she was reported to be paying just three months ago, she’d have to be an Evil Oil Company® or one of the richest people in the world, who also has the worst accountants on earth, because no individual in America pays that much in taxes at this moment in history.

Which brings us to Jeanne Shaheen’s net worth–while we are on the subject.  According to this post last summer in NH Journal, …
Senator Shaheen’s net worth falls between $879,020 and $4,679,992. Senator Shaheen and her husband list assets of between $3,479,020 and $6,010,000.
Anyone care to guess how much they paid in taxes?  I didn’t look, but I’m wondering if it might be less than that secretary the Senator alludes to in her tweet.

Posted in Local NH Politics | Leave a comment

Money Not So Well Spent – 71% of NH Schools Fail to Meet Adequate Yearly Progress

123-abc-alphabet-blocks-optical-illusion-tThese are the skills your kids are not learning
Hat tip to NH Watchdog first and foremost, for reporting this story.
(CONCORD) 71% of New Hampshire schools failed to meet improvement benchmarks in the latest annual progress reports released today by the New Hampshire Department of Education. Over 66% of New Hampshire school districts failed to make the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is either reading or math.
I felt an immediate urge, compelled perhaps, to see how well SAU 26 did.  Merrimack failed to meet AYP in both reading and math.  If I’m not mistaken this is not the first time we’ve been on the wrong side of the results.  But hey!  We met the attendance and graduation requirements.  So does that mean the kids are showing up, not learning enough, and then getting pushed through the system anyway no matter what teachers think?  I bet it does. And maybe we’ll get some Jedi mind-trick action for good measure.

“These are not the progress results you are looking for.”

And as I understand it, these ratings are based on NECAP exams, which set an incredibly low bar to begin with.
Educational experts my ass.  So when do we close up the NH Department of Education?  They clearly serve no useful purpose.

Feel free to look up your own results and share them in the comments.

Image credit www.dreamstime.com

Posted in Local NH Politics | Leave a comment

Help Save Rebecca Kleefisch!

Wis. Lt Governor Rebecca Kleefisch under attack from the left

I’m sure you know the story about the woman verbally abused by a talk radio host?    
When lefty Wisconsin radio host John “Sly” Sylvester accused Kleefisch of performing “fellatio on all the talk-show hosts in Milwaukee” and sneered that she had “pulled a train” (a crude phrase for gang sex), feminists remained silent.
No?  Not familiar?  You never heard about the radio talk show host suggesting that the female Lt. Governor of Wisconsin was performing oral sex on scores of other radio talk show hosts or getting gang banged?  What was missing?

The feminist outrage?  The 24 hour news cycle beating the story to death?  The lack of support from hoards of left wing bloggers and Democrat politicians claiming to be fighting against the War on Women?  How about an apology, did we miss that too?

Rebecca Kleefisch is Wisconsin’s Republican Lt Governor, a TEA Party favorite and conservative.  Scott Walker’s Lt Governor.   And she could be a casualty of the war being waged by Obama and his union backers on Walker and the Republicans who had the backbone and the votes to stand up to union intimidation.  Something we can’t even claim in the Live Free or Die State.

By all accounts she is an exceptional Lt Governor and a rising conservative star in the Republican party.   But she is being under-served in the shadow of the Walker recall and she needs our support to stay in office.  Donate if you can.  Speak out for her if you can’t.  But please do something.

 

Posted in Local NH Politics | Leave a comment